This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of use.

mx gs6

Motorola essentially invented the cell telephone, but it stumbled coming into the smartphone era. It has been making some great phones in the last few years, though, and the new Moto Ten Pure is the latest example of that. With a competitive toll and attractive features, this telephone might offer a practiced culling to the market place leading (and more expensive) Samsung Galaxy S6. Let's see how they compare.

Blueprint and brandish

The Galaxy S6 is sleek and very clean in design, simply it also looks like a lot of other phones — specially the iPhone six. The Moto X is more distinctive, merely all the same recognizable as a Motorola telephone. Information technology has the same curved back and prominent front-facing speakers, whereas the GS6 has a completely flat back that doesn't fit as nicely in your hand. It also has simply i speaker on the bottom edge.

The Pure is also mildly water and dust-resistant with an IP52 rating. The GS6 doesn't take whatever liquid ingress protection. I bet it would survive a quick dip, though, as it lacks a removable back panel for battery access. The Moto X is besides completely sealed, but it has a microSD card slot on the SIM tray, which the GS6 lacks.

mx1

Motorola offers a broad selection of plastic, wood, and leather back panels, along with tinted metal accents, so you can design a phone in the Moto Maker online tool that looks merely the way you want. The Galaxy S6 is all metal and glass, but information technology merely comes in a few colors. These are both beautiful phones in their own mode, simply the Moto Maker customizations really set the Moto X apart. This is definitely one of the main selling points. If y'all don't heed the glass structure, the Galaxy S6 is a much lighter phone. It'due south only 132g to the Moto X Pure'southward 179g.

The Moto X is much heavier considering it'south simply a bigger telephone. The brandish is 5.7-inches on the Pure, a substantial increase compared to terminal year'southward Moto X. The Galaxy S6 is a much more modest 5.1-inches, but the size isn't the only thing that sets them autonomously. Samsung uses Super AMOLED panels, and this one is fantastic. The GS6 has a 2560×1600 resolution AMOLED with very high brightness, perfect viewing angles, and vibrant, yet accurate colors. The GS6 and Note 5 have the best displays you tin go on a smartphone.

GS6-1

I don't think anyone was expecting the Moto Ten Pure to friction match the Samsung Galaxy S6 in the display section, but the visitor did something odd this year. The terminal few Motorola flagships accept had AMOLED panels, but this yr they switched to 1440p LCDs. This might be a cost-saving measure, just the display nonetheless looks good, though non every bit expert as the GS6 obviously. The brightness is expert enough for use outdoors and the viewing angles are in a higher place average. It reminds me very much of the LG G4's LCD, but a bit brighter and not curved. The Moto X's screen is bigger than the GS6, then the pixel density is lower, but both are crisp enough that you lot'll never notice any divergence.

Function of the Moto 10's screen real estate is eaten upward by the on-screen navigation buttons. I adopt this setup personally, but there are many who swear by the concrete buttons yous get on the Galaxy S6. There's also a handy fingerprint scanner in the GS6's abode button. The Moto X doesn't have i of those.

Internals and battery life

The Moto X and Galaxy S6 are both powerful phones, but when it comes to pure horsepower, the GS6 runs away with it. This device has an octa-core Samsung Exynos 7420 system-on-a-chip (SoC) with four (LITTLE) Cortex-A53 cores and four (big) Cortex-A57 in a big.LITTLE configuration. Unlike the similarly specced Snapdragon 810, this chip manages eight cores well without aggressive thermal throttling. Motorola went with a more minor SoC, the Snapdragon 808. This is a hexa-core chip with four Cortex-A53 cores and two Cortex-A57 in a big.LITTLE configuration. The two faster cores produce less heat, then the chip doesn't have to throttle like the more powerful 810.

In daily utilize, the difference in SoC ability is negligible, although the GPU on the Exynos chip is faster than the one on the 808. However, the Snapdragon 808 is less power-hungry than the Exynos. Both phones besides accept NFC chips. It used to be that you didn't need to specify that, but nosotros alive in interesting times (looking at you, OnePlus).

snapdragon-h1

The GS6 and the Moto X Pure both take 3GB of RAM, which is plenty to keep apps running in the groundwork. The Motorola device has typical RAM usage for an Android device, but Samsung has insisted on tuning the organization a bit differently. The GS6 volition only keep a few apps in retentivity, then it ends the groundwork process. It'southward not the sort of thing anybody will notice, simply if you're hopping rapidly betwixt a number of apps, you lot might find they demand to reload as well oft. The Moto X doesn't practice that.

As mentioned above, both phones take sealed-in batteries, but the Motorola'due south is a bit Larger at 3000mAh. The Galaxy S6 is only 2550mAh, but the screen is more efficient to make upwards for information technology. The Moto X volition probably get slightly improve bombardment life under mixed use, but screen time volition be roughly the same. This is assuming the GS6 doesn't take some sort of software glitch that screws up the battery life, which owners seem to mutter near often. Both phones back up quick charging, which tin completely fill a drained battery in around an hr, simply merely the GS6 has wireless charging built-in.

Cameras

Motorola's previous Android phones have had bad cameras. They might have been okay in some circumstances, like brilliant outdoor lite, but The Moto 10 had a lot of room for improvement. Luckily, the Pure has a vastly improved 21MP image sensor with an f2.0 aperture. It doesn't have optical prototype stabilization (OIS), but the software stabilization is surprisingly good. A bit of jostling won't screw up a photograph taken in medium or brilliant light.

  • i of ii